TPO32
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on source of vague sounds that are heard by sailor in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by the following speaker.
Firstly, the writer suggests that orca whales produce special sounds like "quackers" when they mat. While, the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. She explains that these whales live near surface but the submarines move in deeper place of ocean, So it is undetectable to hear orca's sounds in that place.
The second preposition offered by the writer is that living huge squids in deep part of ocean produce sounds which may be cause of this strange sound. However, the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that the mentioned sound had been exist during years between 1960 to 1980 and after that time it has been disappeared. As a result, having no result to stopping the sound by squids, it can not be related to them.
Last, the writer proposes that the sound may be due to another country's submarines. These submarines may have mysterious mission and high level of technology that are not detectable by sonar equipment. On contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. She claims that sound's direction change so quickly, and until now, we do not have such a technology which can alter sound's direction so fast. Thus, the argued sound can not be due to foreign submarines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ike 'quackers' when they mat. While, the speaker views this issue from an o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
... part of ocean produce sounds which may be cause of this strange sound. However, the spe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...aying that the mentioned sound had been exist during years between 1960 to 1980 and a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, may, second, so, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94779116466 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61021315032 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1544631795 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7692307692 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331983220495 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108897572656 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071593876773 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194888212678 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187639996579 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.