The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about who was the author of a mysterious old book which was discovered in 1912. The article strongly postulates that there are three possible authors of this book. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that none of them is the real author of this great manuscript.<br>First and foremost, according to the professor in the lecture, this books contains thousands of secret codes which no one can explain it. Furthermore, Anthony was an ordinary physician who had not such deep-knowledge to create this script. Moreover, Antony's herb was just the common plant mentioned in other medical books. Therefore, there was no evidence to believe that he was its author. Nonetheless, the article offsets these points by declaring that this book might have used as a scientific or magical purpose because there were several high possibilities to believe it. For example, Anthony Ascham who was physician and botanist that illustrated some plants which were very identical with those of ancient book. <br>On top of this, the lecturer further asserts that there was no chance that the author was Edward Kelley who was a fraud that sells fake magical books to wealthy people. To be more specific he did not need to put a lot of hard work on this book to deceive people because the people in sixteen century were naive about such things. In other words, he only wanted to earn money so there was no possibility he was the author. These claims refute the writer's implications about Kelly created this book to sell to rich people and he produced alphabet which was exactly random order. <br>Lastly, the speaker in the lecture suggests that this book's author was not Wilfrid because its ink and page were created in the twelveth century. In other words, Wilfrid could not obtain such rare old ink from his century. Nevertheless, the author counters these implications by insisting that this script was produced by Wilfrid M. Voynich who had enough knowledge to create such masterpiece's fake one. Also, he sold this copy to people who offered enough money to him.
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
- Teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers and business leaders. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin 83
- .Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support arts programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and ex 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... there was no chance that the author was Edward Kelley who was a fraud that sells...
Line 1, column 1359, Rule ID: CD_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
...ve people because the people in sixteen century were naive about such things. In other ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, for example, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9802259887 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62585018888 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9948772785 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.705882353 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.