TPO37
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The listening and the reading passages have a debate on using turtle excluder device (TED) in order to prevent from dying turtles that accidentally caught in the shrimp fishing boats. The writer puts forward 3 main hypothesis for not using of this tool, which are refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that trapping the turtles in the nets is very rare event and may happens only once for any boat. On the other hand, using TEDs needs much money in comparison with the the low chance for surviving one turtle. While the speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to her, there are nearly 1000 shrimp fishing boat now and if only one turtle dies because of caughting in their's nets it is critical number of turtle who are in danger specially for nobel ones. The cost of losing shrimp is not as much as saving a rare species of turtles.
The second preposition offered by the writer is that fishing boats can reduce the amount of time needed for maintaining the net under water, as a result, there is no need applying the TEDs. However, the speaker casts doubt on the assumption by saying that it is possible only in teory, because the government can not monitore mentioned time for each boat.
The writer proposes that TEDs can be use for small turtles and for bigger species it can not be applied. On contrary, the speaker holds on an opposite view. She explains that manufactored TEDs are too small now but it is easy and possible that factories modify the design of TEDs for bigger ones.
Overall, the ideas mentioned in the listening oppose the ideas in the reading passage according to above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...g boats. The writer puts forward 3 main hypothesis for not using of this tool, which are r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...EDs needs much money in comparison with the the low chance for surviving one turtle. Wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...EDs needs much money in comparison with the the low chance for surviving one turtle. Wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he low chance for surviving one turtle. While the speaker views this issue from oppos...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll turtles and for bigger species it can not be applied. On contrary, the speaker...
^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ify the design of TEDs for bigger ones. Overall, the ideas mentioned in the list...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2928027487 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545138888889 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.9540566124 49.2860985944 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0278035632965 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0114235488454 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0173406485929 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0197100664196 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183997489694 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.