tpo40
In this set of material, the reading section discusses three main theories to reject of possibility of human life on Venus's surface, while the speaker casts doubt on the information presented in the passage and gives several reasons to support his viewpoint.
First of all, the article specifies that in the extreme pressure on the venus's surface, human living is impossible, in contrast, the speaker claims that however this is the well-known physical rule that in the high the level of the pressure goes down, if a station would be established in the 50 Km above of the Venus's surface the pressure decreases and it would be as normal as on the earth. She links the level of pressure to latitude, and describes how this problem could be solved.
In addition, the professor disagrees with the idea that there is not any source for obtaining water and oxygen and implies that existing of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid would be a reasonable source for reaching to water and oxygen on them. She also clearly states that water and oxygen are necessary for human being's life, thereby the circumstances are available for initiating life on this planet.
Finally, although according to the passage there is not adequate sunlight on the surface of venus, the professor subscribes to the view that providing a station on the above of the venus's surface would be the solution of all of these problems. Specifically, she gives the impression that a solar power plant on the station would be able to collect both above and below the station reflected light, in this way, great amount of electricity power could be generated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ater and oxygen are necessary for human beings life, thereby the circumstances are ava...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91636363636 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59511556455 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.540411800872 94% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.9332916409 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.142857143 110.228320801 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2857142857 21.698381199 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320778479614 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135934176234 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548953745623 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167439494607 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660111476615 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.3589403974 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 53.8541721854 75% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.