TPO41-W1
Burning coal for energy will produce harmful coal ash, so American environmentalists ask the government to restrict the coal ash storage. The reading passage holds the view that stricter regulations is unnecessary as well as bringing negative result, while the lecturer believes that stricter rules should be carried out.
Firstly, the reading passage shows the fact that those power company has already taking the environmental regulations. For example, they use a device called liner to keep coal ash away from the ground and environment around, showing that extra regulation is unneeded. However, the lecturer argues that the existing regulations are unreliable. The liner mentioned before is not equipped on the old facilities, where poisonous material leak into the soil and underground water. So the stricter regulation is necessary.
Secondly, the reading passage mentions that by recycling the coal ash, products such as building materials can be produced, which is environmental and economical. Stricter rules will bring an negative image of coal ash product to the public and decrease the sale of those product. But the lecturer using the example of mercury, which is handed and stored strictly while recycled successfully, to demonstrate that being aware of the danger of the material won’t do harm to the recycle of this material.
Thirdly, the reading passage indicates that new rules will increase the cost of using coal, probably ten times as much as before, leading the rising of the electricity price. On the other hand, the lecturer suggests that the electricity price will be only one percent more for every family, which is worthwhile for saving the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d economical. Stricter rules will bring an negative image of coal ash product to t...
^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'those products'?
Suggestion: this product; those products
... to the public and decrease the sale of those product. But the lecturer using the example of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39473684211 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81191196326 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2095652973 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483113352805 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161341902793 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902271628444 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283834934448 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558993726684 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.