TPO46
In the passage the author claims that advent of electronic medical records has been beneficial and brings up three reasons to support that. However, the professor contends that the reasons are uncertain and refutes each of them.
At first, the passage hold the view that use of electronic records can help reduce costs, since there is no need to store them physically and they are easily accessible therefor it costs less than copying, faxing, transporting paper reports. The professor, on the other hand, believes that electronic record won't save storage cost. This is due to the fact that doctors don't throw away or discontinue paper records. Actually they keep them as an emergency backup. As a result, still they should pay storage costs associated with paper records.
Additionally, the writer mentions that electronic records are important to reducing the chance of medical errors. Illegible hand writing and nonstandard organization of papers have caused serious errors in some cases. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by stating that doctors still use pen and paper for taking notes and perscriptions when they are examining their patient. In fact these hand writing are then interpreted by office staff to electronic records, hence poor hand writing still can cause a trouble.
Finally, the author suggests that electronic records make it easier and faster to draw out the needed information from the medical databases and they are accessed from any research location. On the contrary, the proffesor points out that researchers still find it difficult to access medical information. This is because of strict privacy laws that let the patients keep their medical record private. Accessing these datas can be a complicated strict procedure and needs permission of patients. Patients can even block the use of their personal medical records.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t. This is due to the fact that doctors dont throw away or discontinue paper records...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, in fact, as a result, in some cases, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37288135593 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6587294497 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.441814324 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0625 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522135020671 0.272083759551 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153258493575 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996748606753 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288923774304 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790008847432 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.