Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Among people, occupation plays an important rule on social class and respect they recieve. In my opinion nowaday teachers are less appreciated and valued by society then they were in the past. in what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my view point.
At first, in the past variety of careers was less that today, and people would apprecite anybody who works and earn money in a correct way. Teachers were part of there people who were respected. On the other hand, nowadays we have plenty of different jobs in any section, and consequently some these job have gain more importance than teaching. For instance, forty years ago when my grandfather was working as a teacher, she was highly valued by other people. Even some families would ask my grandfather's help to solve their issues and problems, since they saw him as wise and highly intelligent person. However, now people hardly rely on opinions of teachers on their personal problems.
Furthermore, teachers are not as essential as they were in the past, which makes them highly valued. In fact, in the past teachers were the only source of education, also people felt that they are owed to teacher for their effort to educate society. Nevertheless, in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, technology and the internet have put the teachers in the background. Without a doubt, we can learn almost every skill and knowledge from the internet and courses, which makes us needless of teachers. Consequently, teachers will lose their value and respect as we use more of the online courses and less of physical classroom education. My own experience demonstrates this concept. In our university, I usually ignore classes and don't listsen to our lecturers, since we can learn those lessons better when I watch online educational videos in YouTube. Most of the students are similar to me and we don't have any dependence on teachers. Consequently, we do not appreciate and value our teacher a lot, because we do not rely on them. Have our teachers lived a few decades ago, they would have got more respect than now.
To conclude, I firmly believe that teachers were more respected and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. This is due to the fact that nowadays not only teaching have less popularity among people, but also online classes are now a better alternative for teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... by society then they were in the past. in what follows, I will delve into the mos...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a correct way" with adverb for "correct"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...recite anybody who works and earn money in a correct way. Teachers were part of there people who...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 753, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...niversity, I usually ignore classes and dont listsen to our lecturers, since we can ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 921, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f the students are similar to me and we dont have any dependence on teachers. Conseq...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, even so, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94581280788 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6496796966 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3302039347 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.619047619 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275428239296 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932043102868 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115221748326 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191838727939 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510012626896 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.