TPO48
Frogs are in danger in recent years and thier population seem to decrease due to the changes in their habital and environmental condition. The passage suggest three posible ways to increase frog population, however, the lecturer cast doubt on practicality of these ways.
First, the passage mentioned, human use pesticides in order to fight against crop failur and insects. The pesticides will eventually dispearse to frog habital and kill tem. If there is a low to prohibit use of these chemicals the frogs population will increase. The lecturer refutes this claim by mentioning the fact that farmers yeild will decrease and they serve disadvantage.
Second, the passage mentioned fungus is adversly affected the frogs population due to the fact that fungas thickening the frog skins whose fully dependant on their skins in order to adsorb water and fungus initiate infection and desease on frogs. Human have to use treatmrnt to protect frogs from infections. In contrast, the lecturer mentioned this method will costly and complex due to the fact that this method have to specialised for individual species and human have to repeat this method for new frog generations.
Finally, the passage mentioned frogs live in wetlands and by prohibit the distruction of frog habitat, frogs could reproduce and their population will growth, on the other hand, the lecturer mentioned the shortage on wetland is due to the global warming and not totally releted to human activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...nd environmental condition. The passage suggest three posible ways to increase frog pop...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dispearse to frog habital and kill tem. If there is a low to prohibit use of these...
^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
... to prohibit use of these chemicals the frogs population will increase. The lecturer ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ntioned fungus is adversly affected the frogs population due to the fact that fungas ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...s thickening the frog skins whose fully dependant on their skins in order to adsorb water...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23206751055 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68271488921 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3517750289 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413918537759 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181104230683 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925376942997 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25660342808 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647726279466 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.