tpo49-integ
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views about the possibility of humpback's navigation by the stars. While the passage lists three feasible reasons for the possibility of this usage; the professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on the accuracy of those clues, and presents some facts the call those clues into the question.
First of all, the article refers to the intelligence of humpback as the capability of this animal for using the night shy for orientation; in contrast, the lecturer refutes this evidence. According to his assertation, the navigation by the sky night is also used by other animals with average cognition, such as the duck. This example shows that usage of sky night for migration is based on the instinct ability by which animal had borne. Consequently, there is no link and connection between the high-level of intelligence of humpback and orientation by the stars.
Another reason which the instructor challenges its validity is the reason explained in the text as the humpbacks move in a straight line; furthermore, since there is no consistent landmark in the seafloor, stars are the landmarks for humpbacks. On the contrary, the lecturer mentioned that humpbacks instead of using the objects, they used external forces such as the earth's magnetic field for this straight movement. As he explains, the humpback possesses a specific part in their brain called bio-magnetic which is sensitive to the magnetic field. Therefore, this sensitive part actuates its brain and guides it in a straight direction. So, the stars could not be accountable for this action.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage mentioned to the spy-hopping as an unusual behavior of humpback used for observation of stars; otherwise, the professor rejects this reason too. According to his explanation, the shark also does the identical action; while it does not either migrate nor looks for the star. The shark main purpose of this action is seeking food. In addition, the humpback does spy-hopping during the morning hours, when there is no star in the sky. Thus, the spy-hopping is not for the stars' observation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e call those clues into the question. First of all, the article refers to the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...humpback and orientation by the stars. Another reason which the instructor chal...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld not be accountable for this action. Finally, meanwhile, the passage mentione...
^^^^
Line 4, column 505, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stars'' or 'star's'?
Suggestion: stars'; star's
...y. Thus, the spy-hopping is not for the stars observation.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21264367816 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94269149155 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0799535192 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328839999518 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110850778765 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528427696137 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191733449698 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627421124969 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.