tpo51
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views about the surprising elephant behaviors. While the passage lists three beliefs about these interesting manners; the professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on the accuracy of those beliefs. In addition, she presents some clues to call them into the question.
First of all, the article said that the elder elephants are aware of their death arrival, and for the sake of this awareness break away from the herds to die alone close to the water lands. In the contrast, the instructor refutes this believe and present evidence that this separation from the herd possesses a practical reason. As she explains, old elephant's teeth are fallen down which causes difficulty at the chewing; consequently, the older elephant cannot follow the group's diet. For this reason, it breaks away from the group to graze the softer vegetables; furthermore, since these plants are mostly raised close to the water, the old elephant starts to live there and after while dies there too. Therefore, this separation from the group is not because of cognition about death but is for finding a suitable form of food.
Secondly, meanwhile, the text mentioned to the artistic abilities of elephants as another belief about striking behavior of elephants; the lecturer, on the other hand, rejects this belief too. According to her assertation, elephants are trained for this purpose, during this training processes, elephants are guided on how to stroke the brush by touching their ears. Indeed, there are so sensitive about their ears and any touch stimulates them. Thus, the trainers by touching elephants' ears, do tricks and teach them to paint the specific line and not how to paint.
Finally, the passage refers to two philosophers and scientists claims that elephants afraid of mice, as the last belief about this animal. On the contrary, the professor denies this belief too. Based on her description, the reaction shown by elephants is not because of fear of mice but is for the sake sense of unfamiliarity by mice. In fact, this is a natural reaction presented by elephants cautiously. In a case, they live close to mice, they get used to mice and know that mice do have no threaten for them; as a result, they will not show the same reaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lues to call them into the question. First of all, the article said that the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...e contrast, the instructor refutes this believe and present evidence that this separati...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for finding a suitable form of food. Secondly, meanwhile, the text mentioned ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e specific line and not how to paint. Finally, the passage refers to two philo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1373.03311258 141% => OK
No of words: 384.0 270.72406181 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03125 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67559210858 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 145.348785872 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549479166667 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0316097783 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.647058824 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.