Traveling to Mars
The reading and lecture are both about the possibility of sending humans to Mars. While the writer states that traveling to Mars is sophisticated and require solving pivotal issues, the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She believes that scientists have proposed solutions for the problems.
First of all, the author claims that round-trip to Mars and back probably takes about two years which is not comparable by going to the moon. Therefore, much more food and oxygen supplies are needed, maybe more than the space ship's cargo capacity. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She asserts that spacemen can use hydroponics. In this case, they can cultivate plants in water instead of soil and produce their food as well as refine the water and air.
The next point brought up is that astronauts are exposed to zero-gravity for months. He mentioned that lack of gravity effects on the human body negatively. However, the professors say that lunching space stations helped the spacemen to learn how to deal with no gravity. She elaborates on this by mentioning that they can do regular exercise or take vitamins to protect their bone's structure.
Finally, the author mentions that the astronauts may expose to high-level of space radiation which is harmful to human. On the other hand, creating a shield that can protect them is going to be so cumbersome. The lecturer puts forth the idea that they are not always in danger and during their travel, some smart instruments can measure the high-level radiation and warn them to stay in the small protected area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ships'' or 'ship's'?
Suggestion: ships'; ship's
...s are needed, maybe more than the space ships cargo capacity. This point is challenge...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, may, so, therefore, well, while, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96629213483 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53614198332 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5223634523 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678070263264 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0181909991566 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410215089897 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424319748004 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368562256705 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.