umans’ growth population, agricultures expansion and using of pesticides contributing birds’ populations decline. summarize all the pint in the lecture and the passage
According to the article, it clams humans’ growth population, agricultures expansion and using of pesticides contributing birds’ populations decline. On contrast, on the authority of the lecture, it does not agree with this statement for the following reasons.
To begin with, the passage claims that humans’ societies growth led to birds’ populations decrease because of the building more cities, malls, high building and offices. That decrease the wildlife of birds. In the oppositions to, the lecture disagrees with this statement. She reveals the growth of humans’ expansions have numerous benefits for bird by providing a plenty of food between buildings and streets like rats. Moreover, she said some species of bird will shrink but, more of them will grow.
Furthermore, according to the reading, it claims the expansion of agriculture by occupied more lands will destroy the habitats area of birds. Nevertheless, the lecturer counterclaims using the lands for agricultures decrease every year by increasing the productivity of the land cubic area, due to planting a different type of crops. At the end, there are no requirements to destroy the wildlands.
Moreover, according to the article, the pesticides have a harmful effect on most of birds’ species. In addition to it may poison the water nearby and the insects. On the contrary, the lecture said most of the pesticides are in market today have much less concentration of chemicals and less harmful for water and insects. Furthermore, there are many transgenic plants that have resistant to insects attractive; moreover, in this case there are no need for using pesticides. As a result, there are no effect on birds’ habitats or their wildlife.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habitats'' or 'habitat's'?
Suggestion: habitats'; habitat's
...by occupied more lands will destroy the habitats area of birds. Nevertheless, the lectur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the birds') or simply say ''most birds''.
Suggestion: most of the birds; most birds
...the pesticides have a harmful effect on most of birds’ species. In addition to it may poison ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.375 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9627152514 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9633426787 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244338681113 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731344040124 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978579663702 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153069840804 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784539566093 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.