us wood company eco-friendly certification
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the American wood company willing to get eco-certification. While the reading states that most of the American wood companies not considering certification for several reasons, The lecture refutes this, saying that despite the reading claim, there are several benefits to obtain certification.
First of all, the reading claims US people aren't trust in broadcasting because a lot of cheap quality products are promoting as new or improved items. However, the professor argues that American consumers haven't treated all announcements the same. Furthermore, the lecture states that Local customers believe independent certifying agencies and they consider them while purchasing.
In addition, the reading makes an argument that eco-friendly certified wood costs more than the regular wood because the company should spend huge money to get the certification. The lecture counters this point by stating that although the buyers consider the price, they compare price between two companies of the same product. According to the professor, consumers don't compare certified and un-certified products in fact, they prefer certified product if the difference is less to obtain quality and protective product.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that certification is only required if the company has international trade but most of the American wood merchants sell their product locally. The lecture refutes this claim b pointing out that although the company doesn't have the international market, certification supports the company from foreign companies competition. Moreover, the professor says if the company has certification, it is for the company to handle the competition, in fact, most of the American companies are capturing international business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the American wood company willing to ge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...st of all, the reading claims US people arent trust in broadcasting because a lot of ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...rofessor argues that American consumers havent treated all announcements the same. Fur...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... According to the professor, consumers dont compare certified and un-certified prod...
^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... pointing out that although the company doesnt have the international market, certific...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ation supports the company from foreign companies competition. Moreover, the professor sa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are capturing international business.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73605947955 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03743634352 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2265789701 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.272727273 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309649110792 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115816100305 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949536033434 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168721590458 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863229864818 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.8541721854 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.