w1 Professors benefit from appearing on TV.
The reading and the lecture are both about the professors who attend the tv shows as guests. The author of the reading thinks that a large community including the students, the public, the universities and the professor himself get benefit from these type of tv appearances. But, the lecturer casts doubts on the claims made in the article. She believes that no one gets any benefit from these type of activities.
First of all, the author mentions that if a professor appears in a tv show, he can reach a lot of people. He adds that if the professors had published his view in some research paper, only a few people will have access to that. But, appearing on tv will benefit a huge number of people as they can easily watch the shows on tv. As a result, the reputation of the professor as scholar increases. But, the lecturer challenges this point. She argues that these type of tv appearances are not good in a professional standpoint. Because other scholars take this negatively and may not invite that particular professor in important technical conferences and the professor can face problems in managing the fund to do his research.
Secondly, the author contends that universities also get benefits from these tv shows. He further explains that if people see a professor in a tv show from a particular university, they will think that the university has got knowledgeable persons on its faculty list. The author rebuts this point too. She opines that these tv programs waste a lot of time of the professors in many ways. As a result, they can't do their research perfectly and often become unable to do their own business and responsibilities.
Finally, the article says that as most of the common people have no contacts with scholarly people, they get a chance to learn a lot of things from the insightful discussions of the professors from these shows. But, the lecturer, on the other hand, does not agree with this view because she concurs with the view that the authority of the tv shows does not want insightful discussion but they only want the title, which they can use to increase their popularity. As a result, there remains no difference among a scholarly professor and a well prepared tv reporter in these tv shows.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tv' or ''?
Suggestion: this tv;
... rebuts this point too. She opines that these tv programs waste a lot of time of the pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...fessors in many ways. As a result, they cant do their research perfectly and often b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 511, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('scholarly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('professor') instead of another adjective.
...sult, there remains no difference among a scholarly professor and a well prepared tv reporter in thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 389.0 270.72406181 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76863753213 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72343655709 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47557840617 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8855879259 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6315789474 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36603316579 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121975286572 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855765519287 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240672803274 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497638038303 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.