Whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 479, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...his hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to th...
^^^
Line 10, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 740, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 955, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...his hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to th...
^^^
Line 14, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 740, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 955, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...his hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to th...
^^^
Line 18, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 740, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 955, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...his hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to th...
^^^
Line 22, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 740, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 955, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...his hypothesis cannot explain this idea.The listening lecture totally opposes to th...
^^^
Line 26, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 740, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 955, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 30, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, lastly, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 112.0 10.4613686534 1071% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 42.0 5.04856512141 832% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 35.0 7.30242825607 479% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 56.0 12.0772626932 464% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 147.0 22.412803532 656% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 259.0 30.3222958057 854% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 63.0 5.01324503311 1257% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 8780.0 1373.03311258 639% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 1815.0 270.72406181 670% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83746556474 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 6.52708333088 4.04702891845 161% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27990924661 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.0793388429752 0.540411800872 15% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 2727.9 419.366225166 650% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 3.25607064018 645% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 63.0 8.23620309051 765% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 21.0 1.25165562914 1678% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 28.0 2.5761589404 1087% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 121.0 13.0662251656 926% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4283429536 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5619834711 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.23140495868 7.06452816374 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.09492273731 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 33.0 4.19205298013 787% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 42.0 4.45695364238 942% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 65.0 4.27373068433 1521% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23737956274 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617411902626 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076598749051 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154234282734 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951313667915 0.0443174109184 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 1.23 8.42419426049 15% => Dale chall readability score is low.
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.