Building shelter forests
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in the topic of the effectiveness in building shelter forests. To begin with, the reading says that building shelter forests can not only help prevent desertification and erosion, but also contribute to farming. However, the listening argues that it will not be effective to farming. It is true that it can help prevent desertification and erosion, but these trees will soak up the groundwater and this can cause problem to vegetations because they cannot absorb enough water supply. Moreover, evidences have shown that the level of groundwater is dropping after we start building shelter forests. Thus, building these trees will be harmful to farming.
In addition, while the reading indicates that building shelter forests can provide habitat for plants and animals to survive, the listening disagree with this idea. Researchers find out that the plants and animals live in the habitat create by shelter forests are uniformed., which means that only a few species can survive in this habitat. As a result, it cannot provide a suitable habitat for many species to survive. Besides, when there are lack of diversification, trees will be more susceptible to disease. Thus, the listening implies tat building shelter forests will not be effective.
Lastly, the reading asserts that building this can made people plant more trees and it can reduce the effects of global warming. Nevertheless, the listening is not convinced by this explanation. The majority of plants in the area where people build shelter forests, will still be low green plants, such as grass. These grass will not be helpful to global warming because they cannot absorb much carbon dioxide. Besides, these plants can retain heat and make the environment even warmer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd animals live in the habitat create by shelter forests are uniformed., which me...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, in addition, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25347222222 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68245965403 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503472222222 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5254063797 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5625 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32973152658 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12528885339 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134475436134 0.0662205650399 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242723109057 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909690528552 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.