Reading explains that many employees in United States want to do job four days a week instead of five days a week and and suggest to pay eighty percent of their original salary. Consequently, they can get more rest, reduce unemployment and spend more time with family. The lecture refutes all these points made in reading.
First, According to lecturer, this suggestion may lead to firm to spend more money, which balance the benefit obtained by paying less to worker. He claims that by hiring new employ and acquire medical health and training means spending more money. In addition, there will need more office and computers for new employees would simply cut the benefit.
Second, lecture suggests that four days working scenario may increase the unemployment. He contends that there may increase expectation to get five days work in four days and this overtime works can increase unemployment.
Finally, working less days comparatively have greater risk to lose job. Because of less stability in office they may not get promotion. On the other hand people working five days a week have more chances to become manager and have responsibility to manage entire week works.
In conclusion, According to lecture, four days working plan may increase unemployment, job unstability and non beneficial for company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...days a week instead of five days a week and and suggest to pay eighty percent of their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...ighty percent of their original salary. Consequently they can get more rest, reduce unemploy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... training means spending more money. In addition there will need more office and compute...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rease unemployment. Finally, working less days comparatively have greater risk to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...days comparatively have greater risk to loose job. Because of less stability in offic...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...week have more chances to become manager and have responsibility to manage entire...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sibility to manage entire week works. In conclusion, According to lecture, fo...
^^^
Line 9, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, According to lecture, four days working plan may increase unem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, may, second, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21126760563 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64093583569 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600938967136 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.061194132 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384145461104 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136439774228 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126998611396 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210740463402 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854966701944 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.