working four days a week or not
The reading and the lecture are both about working four days week. The reading passage explains three different options of working just four hours a week and the lecture contradicts these options.
First, the reading states that employees in The United States prefer working four days a week because they will benefit from the policy. On the other hand, the lecture refutes the idea when the professor mentions that working four days a week will force the company to spend more money. Adding more employees the company will have to pay medical insurance and more training and cost will be the same if work four days or five employees. Also, they have to increase more space and computers and that will cut into the company's profit.
Secondly, the reading states that if the employees work fewer days the unemployment will be reduced because the workload will be distributed between the new workers that the company hired. On the other side, the lecturer mentions that hiring new employees will be costly and not many jobs will be available. The company will realize that employees that work four days could do the same as an employee that works five days.
Finally, the reading states that reducing the hours to four days a week would be a benefit for employees and their families because they will have the possibility to spend time with their families. The professor disagrees, when he says that more free time, will cut the quality of life and decrease the job stability. Employees that work four days a week are likely to lose their jobs. Also, companies prefer five days working because they are more qualified to manage the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lecture contradicts these options. First, the reading states that employees...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat will cut into the companys profit. Secondly, the reading states that if th...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e as an employee that works five days. Finally, the reading states that reducin...
^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eek are likely to lose their jobs. Also, companies prefer five days working becau...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86476868327 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23455808432 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448398576512 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4056517044 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441444387008 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237060919122 0.0996497079465 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181862352405 0.0662205650399 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347901449343 0.162205337803 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103702661348 0.0443174109184 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.