The fashion technology industry have a big influence on people. Is it a good or bad thing?
Fashion technology is one of the most attracted developments in the modern world. The emergence has affected with a huge transformation of the attitude of people to the recent trends. Although, it has some negative result, it has greater benefits to the people in various ways.
To begin with, plenty of changes happened in the modern world in the region of fashion when compared to the past. In olden days people had an orthodox and cultural concepts about the outfits they use in daily life which restricts them in using trendy attire as the society considers it as an insult to the social status. To be more precise, women in the olden days were held to wear only traditional dress which does not expose their body features. Gradually with the introduction of western dress many elected to wear those dress which are comfortable and stylish.
Moreover, an outfit brings more confidence to an individual on different counts. Comfortable and modish dressing habits made people to be build confidence in themselves as well as improve the social status. The quality of a person can be identified from the dressing style to an extent. As an example, a person who is well-groomed would be more pleasing than a person who does not wear a clean one. This will showcase the status of the person and could meet respect from the society. Thus people today are more focused on their attire as it would grab attention and respect from the people.
However, there are many who oppose the modern styles which are considered to be vulgar and exposing the body features which could attract the people irrespective of the age would result in various offenses and misleading actions in the society.
In conclusion, people are cautious about their appearance and it changes day by day. Although there are some bad impacts, the emergence of advanced fashion technology helped people to transform their personality to higher quality.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9907120743 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60550918709 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523219814241 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9012371071 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0548787377861 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227322614632 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450553109996 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038743714973 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365953258709 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.