Claim Restaurant should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve Reason This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet related health problems Write a response in which you discuss the ex

Essay topics:

Claim: Restaurant should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve.
Reason: This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet-related health problems.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

The author of the claim above argues that nutritional information about the food served must be displayed by restaurants in order to help clients both to choose healthy dishes and to avoid food which are cause of allergies. As far as I am concerned, I tend to totally agree with his opinion and with the evidence he has provided.

Nowadays, more and more people care about the fitness of their body and, thus, they follow a very strict diet. For many of them going out for lunch or dinner is always a hidden problem. They usually become embarrassed as they have to choose a dish from a menu which do not provide the exact ingredients and nutrition facts of what they are going to eat. For this reason, the suggestion made by the author is well-reasoned and it would substantially improve the confidence of these people while eating outside home. Moreover, not only it would give advantages to the clients, but also it would boost restaurants’ economy since more people would be encouraged to eat outside.

Furthermore, many people are affected by diet-related health problem and eating at the restaurant sometimes could be very dangerous for many of them. This situation is caused by the unclear declaration of ingredients made by restaurants that usually provide uncomplete information at the moment of the order and then, when sometime bad happen, they reject what they have said in order to avoid any blame. The policy proposed would force restaurants to give detailed and correct information about the ingredients of every dished and, as a consequence, would protect clients from having terrible allergic crisis.

On the other side of the argument it may be argued that the application of this policy would be expensive and time-consuming for all that concerns the certifications that must be obtained. However, it would be for sure a worthy investment as many people would be encouraged to eat at the restaurants providing a higher income at the companies.

In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that all restaurants must be forced to openly provide clients with the ingredients of the dishes they are serving in order to both offer a high-quality service to all of them and to boost their own firm’s business.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from having terrible allergic crisis. On the other side of the argument it may...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84870305519 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510695187166 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0480411943 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7692307692 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221475800351 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820064259325 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655458675011 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129508499655 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475449017188 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.