abc?
Usually, we witness people with a diverse opinion and this essentially holds relevance with regard to the current topic. We encounter one set of people arguing in favour of integrating employees in the decision-making process because they see merits in that direction. Surprisingly it is quite common to come across another set of people holding an opinion contrary to the other one. I am under the impression that taking the opinion of all the staff certainly has a bright side and at the same time, I would like to reiterate darker side to not ensuring the perception of the employees while making decisions.
Despite having many advantages, few deserve specific elaboration. One of the few advantages that can be highlighted in this juncture is sometimes higher authority can't think the way employees can and that would be beneficial as well. It is pretty obvious that this can benefit humans in many ways.
While we understand how this can be advantageous, we can't entirely ignore how the same can be detrimental to the well-being of the people. One can inevitably observe a completely different shade and this topic cannot be an exception. The one that requires reference could be the confusion that can be occurred just because of the involvement of everybody.
It can be concluded that one would better strike a balance between what is beneficial and what can be harmful. Hence, it is always advisable to direct one's effort in the right direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... juncture is sometimes higher authority cant think the way employees can and that wo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t this can benefit humans in many ways. While we understand how this can be adva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rstand how this can be advantageous, we cant entirely ignore how the same can be det...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, well, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8611371665 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561475409836 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3565102324 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.