The advanced medical technology expands human’s life. Do you think it is a curse or blessing?
Due to the advancement in medical technology, the life expectancy of humans has increased up to a great extent. Some people believe that medical technology is a blessing for mankind, whereas some people believe that medical technology is turning into a curse for humans. This essay will discuss why developments in medical technology is a curse for humans.
At some point in the near future, there will be a population explosion due to continuous innovations in medical technology. Overpopulation will put extreme pressure on infrastructure, healthcare system. For instance, India’s population is growing at a rapid rate and poverty has increased by ten percent in the last two decades. Generally speaking, advancements in medical technology will cause some serious implications.
It has been observed that medical advancements have caused a drastic increase in life expectancy in developed countries. Some nations have an older population and it is not good for any growing economy. As an illustration, China’s seventy percent population is above sixty years and they have a shortage of working population which has slowed down their gross domestic product by ten percent. In conclusion, due to advancement in medical technology death rate has drastically decreased.
This essay discussed why advancement in medical technology has turned as a cure because it leads to population explosion and a drastic increase in life expectancy. In my opinion, developments in medical technology have proved to be a curse.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48936170213 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24350798474 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523404255319 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8165939526 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2307692308 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275291503505 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108302307671 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732106774887 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181178415961 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721877714959 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.