Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
Recently, the phenomenon of age discrimination and its corresponding impacts have sparked a significant debate. Some people believe that discrimination against older workers be made illegal and others maintain the opposite of this argument. Although contested by many that the matter of age discrimination is highly controversial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. This essay will discuss age discrimination and making decision based on the age is illegal.
From a general standpoint, in a work place, making decision based on a person's age provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that older workers' mental disorders as well as their financial downturn are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic survey which discovered older workers are more effective. Thus beneficial ramification of both experience and practical knowledge are apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, performing active participating in a work place by elderly workers might increase some consequences of less effectiveness. Moreover, elder worker can not perform well as do as youngers. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university emphasized that the downside of the age discrimination is correlated negatively with mental disorders. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of this phenomenon.
This essay discussed the consequences of age discrimination with several compelling arguments. In my opinion, I profoundly believe that age discrimination is illegal and need to be addressed by the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant debate. Some people believe that discrimination against older workers be ...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...vered older workers are more effective. Thus beneficial ramification of both experie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74131274131 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48349859356 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7112917393 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.384615385 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252719529563 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886559950045 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673161213531 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157637825416 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783424588366 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.