are the cars damaging the environment? should the numbers of car be restricted to one for one family?
Recently, the phenomenon of the car usage and its corresponding impact on the environment has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the restriction is highly beneficial, such issue might be regrded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that timposing rules can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the car restrictions can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the traffic jam and car numbers are interwined inextricably with not only the social welfare but also car sharing plans. According to my own experience, when I was a university stuedent, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more social interactions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the public transportation and cheap trips apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of environment science, the car usage might increases the consequences of air pollutions. Moreover, fundamental aspects of damaging the environment would relate to this reality that the demerits of greenhouse gases pertain to green taxes. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the environmental issue is correlated negatively with health-related problems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of carbon dioxide emission.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the restriction of car usage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of environmental causes prove the significance of social subjects, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61797752809 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32470372237 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621722846442 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7586512767 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221900403037 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669005296429 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062492622119 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121561821534 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375476641923 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.