Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private lives
People always do love to know about the celebrities. Therefore the news media always tends to find out what the current affairs of their stars. It is true that famous people are disturbed by the media.
Through media they always increase their popularity and also the media channels would also get a chance of increase their sales and and popularity as well. Due to the competition they are having with their competitor media channels they do not consider much about ethics.
However there should be at least some kind of an ethical guideline should be practiced. Irrespective of the fame celebrities have they also have the right to enjoy the confidentiality of their private life. Not only the celebrity, their family members are also exposed to the world due to this unethical behaviour. In 1997 Princess Diana was caught with an accident at the aim of escaping from the papparazees. Some celebrities also face in troubles with the rumours which are not true. These gossips can ruin their dignity and their loved ones lives as well.
On my point of view media should carter to their customer desires at the same time they should also consider on the celebrity’s private life irrespective of earning lucrative profits.
In conclusion the behaviour of media is crucial in evasion of celebrity’s life therefore they should treat their customers and vendors in a fair manner since all of the three parties mentioned above dependents on each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... do love to know about the celebrities. Therefore the news media always tends to find out...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...so get a chance of increase their sales and and popularity as well. Due to the competit...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... do not consider much about ethics. However there should be at least some kind of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
... However there should be at least some kind of an ethical guideline should be practiced. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... can ruin their dignity and their loved ones lives as well. On my point of view m...
^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fair manner" with adverb for "fair"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hould treat their customers and vendors in a fair manner since all of the three parties mentione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...mers and vendors in a fair manner since all of the three parties mentioned above dependent...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tioned above dependents on each other.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, at least, in conclusion, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06172839506 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72082134729 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572016460905 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8893450104 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6153846154 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349491733412 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120266986207 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061097144308 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186046956755 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314645156994 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.