Automation: A boon or a bane? With advances in Machine Learning and Deep Learning, Automation seems to be the next big innovation of our times. What are your views on the widespread application of automation?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and the negative effects on society due to the automation of applications with the help of different tools. While it is possible to claim that the automation removes human resources from the production line, my point of view that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the automation processes.
First and foremost, there are myriad of positive effects from automation such as high quality, confidentiality, availability, integrity, portability, usability and security. For example, a web or a mobile application can test at any time with the help of auto pilot without human interference. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the automation is the best solution for a company that has a scientific production line.
On the other hand, those who believe the negative side of the autopilot has a different point of view and say automation remove the human from the production. For instance, hundreds of web applications can test without the staff. Therefore, it is taken into account that the information technology will be controlled by the automated information systems and it is a risk for the human being. But, practically this has implemented all over the globe without any hazard.
In conclusion, it is believed that automation as the next generation of software development and mechanical production. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that the new policy, acts, and regulation should establish with them by the governments and the professionals' with disaster recovery planes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 5.75862068966 382% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17766684453 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0401834322 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180316060822 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664790901707 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297707962751 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110032050177 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182839119567 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.