In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of using credit cards in a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the electronic payment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the proliferation of credit cards can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, being cashless for using credit cards can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that some cheque payments, as well as any accessibility, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered this modern facility. Thus beneficial ramifications of the availability and speeds apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of financial issues, having a cashless society by the trends of credit cards might increase the consequences of cyber-crimes. Moreover, fundamental aspects of using debit cards relate to this reality that the demerits of any over spending money pertain to any easy accessibilities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of paying much money is correlated negatively with an over-emphasized electronic payment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having a cashless society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using credit cards prove the significance of any electronic payments, but also pinpoint some cyber-attacks implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... which discovered this modern facility. Thus beneficial ramifications of the availab...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61313868613 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31411780792 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8550962413 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187257032633 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686594405209 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555401647667 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115767693343 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233330809135 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.