Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree?
In modern era, there is a debate whether music has positive or negative influence in children lives. Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. I agree with the notion that music can significantly affect children life in positive way and encourage certain kind of learnings. This essay will discuss both side in details and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, music allows children to express their feelings, encourage them to work as team, respect the each other’s differences. All these things help them to think more creatively and to broaden up their horizon and have an out of box thinking. For example, in a recent study, scientists found that learning music can activate several electrical signals and waves in our brain which help them brain to work more actively, which help children to learn more things and more quickly. Therefore, learning music can promote to be more creative and think out of the box.
On the flip side, several schools and parents believe that children should focus more on academic subjects such as science and mathematics to achieve success in this technological era. Learning music is waste of time and divide children’s focus and can affect the academic performance and music cannot lead into an earning professional. For instance, my friend’s mother always encourages him to focus on academic subjects to get good marks and secure a place in MIT institute though he is interested in to play piano. So, people still believe that music is totally waste of time and energy.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that music help children to learn lifelong lesson those cannot be taught by any academic books, so I believe that children should learn music and parents and teacher should encourage them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66338130954 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2691184544 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302061244652 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131141500073 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143590787464 0.071462118173 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201600154369 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116057566451 0.0609392437508 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.