Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
Recently, the phenomenon of communications and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the recent changes is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that communication ways are highly beneficial, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From communists standpoint, communication instruments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that telecommunication, as well as strong communication, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of communications. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both communicable methods and ways apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social communications, N might increase the consequences of communication problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of communicable data relate to this reality that the demerits of poor communications pertain to communication drawbacks. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the social communitive aspects is correlated negatively with the communication issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of communication.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the strong communications far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern communications prove the significance of remote communications, but also pinpoint communication implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...gatively with the communication issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11934156379 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.82530598017 2.71678728327 141% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637860082305 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3956329184 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202738756588 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669792599118 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466964428605 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112907731943 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445682904983 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 53.1260098522 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 11.5310837438 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.