Companies use advertisement to influence people to buy things sometimes they do not need. give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the advertisement and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the buyer’s behavior is highly beneficial, some issue regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial numbers of individuals. I am inclined to believe that shopping centers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, purchasing products can provide the society by some noticeable effects which are rooted in this facts that the merits of TV advertisements as well as the online shopping are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiences, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered buyers chooses. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of the window shopping and the increasing demand apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, influencing costumers increase the consequences of spending money by purchasers. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of online campaigns relate to this reality that the demerits of useless products pertain to people wages. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of newspaper advertisement is negatively correlated with increasing demand. Hence, it is correct that the presumed preconceived notion of buying products.
Ton conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of advertisement far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of buyers prove the significant of enhancing the economy but also pinpoint decreasing the unemployment implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... noticeable effects which are rooted in this facts that the merits of TV advertiseme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75396825397 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33485415042 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65873015873 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5969416611 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805687042442 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026735909083 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199010038719 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0446273811557 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026770520967 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.