The debate whether or over the adventurous activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping is an old one, with the attitude of people shifting throughout the debate over years. Proponents and opponents make their cases to endorse their views on this contagious issue. In this essay, I will analyze this matter from both point of view and then draw a conclusion at the end. In my opinion, the onus should be on the government.
There are numerous arguments surrounding my viewpoint that people who employed themselves in these activities gets into plight of loosing life at any time but the most important factor that needs to be considered relates to the rewards that are offered on these actions. In other words, persons just to show their abilities or for the sake of price money put their life into risk. To elaborate further, few pertinent examples can be taken into consideration and this is my own personal experience when I went to Manaali for vacations I went through these moment in which a boy was badly wounded and he was hardly getting special treatment.
On the other side of the fence, critics also believed that persons need to embroil in these activities to confront their fear unless they could never evacuate their hidden talent. However, those who advocate this viewpoint are fail to see the picture in this large context. The other school of thoughts is these activities should be promoted only when they have been doing into experts area and completely safe. It is proverbial that there are myriad of chances to convene ordeal.
In the light of above discussion, it is fair and justifiable to say everything should be experienced but under the proper fostering.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this moment' or 'these moments'?
Suggestion: this moment; these moments
...to Manaali for vacations I went through these moment in which a boy was badly wounded and he...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 20.9802955665 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93006993007 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55701287287 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9251239986 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0744990634997 0.242375264174 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243779423651 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556834662108 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420344108397 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465740678491 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.