Discuss the positive and negative effect impact of design of buildings on people’s life and work.

Essay topics:

Discuss the positive and negative effect impact of design of buildings on people’s life and work.

Our surrounding plays a vital role in everybody life. Nowadays, whether design of building’s effects on people’s life and work attributed to numerous controversies among different stratum of societies. Opponents argue that a design on building does not have any kind of ill effect of occupants work and their life, while on the other hand proponents argue in favor of this idea that a building does have significant effect on its occupant’s life. In this upcoming paragraph’s I shall elucidate this phenomenon with logical arguments and will lead to conclusive design.

First and foremost, there are myriad numbers of reason which support this notion, and the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that as a human we are surrounded by many things and they influence our behavior and a building or house is one of them. A house not only save us from bad weather but also provide security as well. According to recent study done by source one in US reported that one who lives in well designed homes tends to have positive attitude towards their work and life, while on the other hand those lives in shabby homes have a negative view toward life.

Another key justification to support this argument is that natural sources availability such as air and sunlight in the building can have the tremendous effect on the workforce which eventually increase their efficiency up to a certain level, and a well designed building use natural sources more efficiently rather than a unplanned designed building.

In the light of the discussion above one can easily understand that there are abundant benefits of a well designed building. In my opinion i support this idea that a carefully designed structure have more greater benefit to one life.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sources'' or 'source's'?
Suggestion: sources'; source's
...o support this argument is that natural sources availability such as air and sunlight i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entually increase their efficiency up to a certain level, and a well designed bui...
^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...al sources more efficiently rather than a unplanned designed building. In the ...
^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
...hat a carefully designed structure have more greater benefit to one life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06872852234 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8669681105 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6940461111 50.4703680194 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.9669160288 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354397114499 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129367490782 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111767383806 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186519073645 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109093501942 0.0609392437508 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.