Do the dangers derived from the use of chemiclas in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your won experience or knowledge.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on society due to the hazard of food production chemicals. While it is possible to claim that the production should address the food market requirement, my point of view is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages of the low-quality food supply. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing both sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of disadvantages a nation can gain from the chemical usage in food production line such as integrity of food, confidentiality, food availability, food security, life expectancy, and food quality. For example, apples that are available in Sri Lankan domestic market have lots of chemicals; therefore, most of the locals reject this fruit. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the inorganic chemicals are not fit for the human body.
On the other hand, those who believe the other side of the argument have a different point of view and say the production line should supply the demand for the food market. For instance, the food industry employers have over used the chemicals without considering the encapsulation of the food. Therefore, it is considered that the quantity is the best more than the quality. But this is not a practical concept and most of the developed countries have rejected this.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the food is the main source for cancer and the obesity of the modern human. In nut shell, governments and the professionals should implement rules and regulations to mitigate this risk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s; therefore, most of the locals reject this fruit. Therefore, it is taken into cons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10294117647 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90997233902 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4373750997 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142678345079 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493236732567 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481160048434 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853138916482 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299962800355 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.