Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producer not over-package products in the first place?
Packaging is not only protecting and retain the quality of product but also attract more customers. Some people believe that consumers should avoid over packaged products. While others argue that it producer’s responsibility to not over-package products in the first place. I am inclined to believe both are responsible for that should take appropriate action to stop that. This essay will discuss responsibility of both and then will share my opinion.
To commence with, over packing may attract to the customers but required extra effort to them to have in while running out of time like card-board boxes and widely contribute in land filling as people just litter them after using them. For example: McDonald was first to started card-board boxes, plastic cups and plastic wrappers to give people provision to have on their way. So, consumers should avoid that to provide such option as it is responsible for pollution too and take help from producer as well.
Secondly, producers are equally responsible to promote over packaging, that’s not required for all products except the fragile ones at first place and concentrate on product quality. Even producers really produce environment friendly packaging material or the material which can be recycled easily. For instance: Amazon always has so many layers of packaging for small product that’s totally waste of resources where quality of products are not up to the mark. Thus, producers must focus on quality of products instead of over packaging at first place.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that both producers and consumers are responsible for over packaging. In my opinion, both should put effort to improve product quality to attract customers instead of over-packaging where it’s not required.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40989399293 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82545018091 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575971731449 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2331127819 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.25397266985 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489130900488 0.242375264174 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191601140255 0.0925447433944 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138495233927 0.071462118173 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315184344773 0.151781067708 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128974587961 0.0609392437508 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.