Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?

Essay topics:

Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?

Today, over-packaging products are flooding the market. Since over packaging costs the consumer as well as the environment. There is an urgent need to curtail its usage. It is a producer’s responsibility to reduced the packaging products over the market. Producer’s should work towards both costs saving and reduced the environmental damage.
To begin with, over- packaging often shoot up the products price significant. Therefore, less packaging automatically pull the rate downwards. For example, Macdonald pack their burgers in paper wraps and put it in cardboard container and then put it hand to customer in paper bags. If they only put it in a box and reduce the burger price.
To the other hand, Over-packaging is a significant catalyst for environment damage as it augments co2 emission. It is a producer’s responsibility to reduce the harm full ecosystem. For instance, box packaging costs trees which is not only buyer and seller but the whole planet. So it is the best interest of everyone to use minimal packaging products. Therefore, producer’s should avoid the packaging products.
To sum up, as aforementioned, over-packaging is a very bad effects on environmental. So it is the producer’s responsibility to control the all packaging products. Over- packaging is very harmful of our ecosystem and they are emission of augments of co2 emission.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hands'?
Suggestion: hands
... in cardboard container and then put it hand to customer in paper bags. If they only...
^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...mentioned, over-packaging is a very bad effects on environmental. So it is the producer...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as well as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40092165899 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52099668502 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.5024630542 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1798249921 50.4703680194 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.9411764706 104.977214359 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7647058824 20.9669160288 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354969141223 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128131286278 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102590546446 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221715614322 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888537297796 0.0609392437508 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 10.9458128079 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.15 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.3980295567 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.