Do you think consumers should avoid the purchase of over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views with any relevant example pf your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of consumerism and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of purchasing simple-packed products is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advertisements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, over-packaged products can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern packaging methods, as well as colourful boxes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of avoiding plastic in packaging. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both consumers' awareness and social demands apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, extra packaging might increase the consequences of environmental problems. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of over-consumption might relate to this reality that the demerits of low-quality products would pertain to levying on the packaging. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of low-weight packaging is correlated negatively with extra-packaged supplements. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of industrialization.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of nature-friendly products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern companies prove the significance of making strict rules for packaging, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
... Thus, beneficial ramifications of both consumers awareness and social demands apparently...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90733590734 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55377668432 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660231660232 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7064955978 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202577039138 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055685235014 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479128287586 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100949174437 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573497396418 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.