Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree / Disagree ?
A certain type of music affects young children's learning. Some people state that listening to music is highly beneficial while others argue that may create many health problems. I am inclined to believe that listening to different kinds of songs will be an added advantage for children. This essay will analyze both sides with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, music has numerous benefits not only in learning but also to heal certain kind of diseases. It helps to improve concentration and memory power of young kids. It helps to open new thoughts and ideas. Young children who are learning music can build pride and confidence. Learning certain kinds of music helps us to overcome risk and deal with tough conditions that we encounter in our daily life. For example, children who have stage fear will be able to build self-confidence and build positive attitude while learning different musical instruments. Moreover, kids learn teamwork as most of the programs require coordination among students. Children can also learn creativity and help them to solve any problem outside the box.
On the other hand, there are few people argue that the influence of instruments might increase the consequences of health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research done by a team of prestigious university found that the playing piano for hours will lead to finger problems. From the above example, it can be clearly seen that learning and playing music can lead to several diseases.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that learning different types of music will not only promote learning but also help to build secure future in the music field. In a nutshell, I believe that the benefits of music far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12080536913 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69748567924 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9133143745 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7647058824 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 6.9802955665 215% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285487432006 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104383985001 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126648887974 0.071462118173 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166903978461 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760845205426 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.