In this day and age, the issue of students’ assessment has sparked a heated debate. In this regards, a substantial number of people put this idea forward that pupils’ appraisal should be in a written format. Personally, I am inclined to highly believe that this method of evaluation is quite effective. This will be analyzed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
For one, it is commonly accepted that written examinations impose less stress to students during the tests compared to other test methods such as oral exams. In this regard, according to an article published in the Journal of Modern Education, MIT researchers have revealed that students who underwent written examination are 20% less under stress and pressure imposed by the exam compared to those who took other test forms. Hence, beneficial ramifications of such evaluation can be seen.
In addition to this, from social equity perspective, being tested by written formats make contributions to provide equal assessment conditions for all applicants. Take Iranians’ university entrance exam for instance. In this form of performance appraisal, all candidates are asked not only the exact questions, but also in the same manner and situation. As a consequence, it is coherent that written examinations are recognized to be fair and precise. Thus, why this idea has garnered support can be seen with clarity.
In conclusion, after analyzing the issue of stress level as well as the issue of fair examination, it can be felt that this method of assessment is far more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...essment has sparked a heated debate. In this regards, a substantial number of people...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26482213439 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0561565404 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7829877015 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.461538462 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111969809415 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043207711935 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474798010751 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689340025178 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248269613913 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.