Environment has become a major concern over the last of couple of decades. resulting in several debtaes on who should be responsible for ensuring its sustenance for our future generations.
In today's world, the pollution has sparked the debate for endurance of the life expectancy for the current and coming generation. Warning message as raised in sea level and pollution in oceans have created a catastrophic problem for us which need quick action on priority basis. In this essay I shall discuss the reasons and solutions to re-mediate the problems and will provide the logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are myriad and conspicuous reasons which are responsible for current environmental pollution either water or soil. One of them is usage of plastic in daily life which has significant role to pollute air and water. In addition increase in production of vehicles and increase in emerging of CO2 and other catastrophic gases. The today's generation is not able to take breath in big cities and bad air, water causing the many chronic diseases.
Secondly, the responsibilities of removing these bad elements which are beleaguered us and decreasing our life expectancy are on shoulder of every individual. People should use traditional method to commute to office or emphasize the car pool. Every citizen must avoid to use plastics and do not liter the air quality by burning these wastage. The regime of province has power to encourage people to obligate the direction to save this earth.
In recapitulate, While there is strong demand to save the earth by following some measure steps. People should save every endangered species and pave the attentions to nurture the nature as heaven place. I would recommend people should avoid plastic and use recycle products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays world, the pollution has spark...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d will provide the logical conclusion. Firstly, there are myriad and conspicuou...
^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...icant role to pollute air and water. In addition increase in production of vehicles and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...f CO2 and other catastrophic gases. The todays generation is not able to take breath i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er causing the many chronic diseases. Secondly, the responsibilities of removi...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wastage' or 'these wastages'?
Suggestion: this wastage; these wastages
...do not liter the air quality by burning these wastage. The regime of province has power to en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gate the direction to save this earth. In recapitulate, While there is strong d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15953307393 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77862425932 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0824829775 50.4703680194 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907383281235 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292858042162 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365237845473 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515615949685 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218124749835 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.