Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Books are the best option to gain knowledge, but sometimes the most important lesson or toughest lesson we learn in life come from the different practical situation. We cannot learn everything from books and in my opinion, the knowledge we gain from our experience is far more important.
Firstly, the human body can understand better from practical as compared to books. Of course, learning from books is great to collect new ideas, theoretical knowledge. But these techniques cannot be implemented well when a person does not gain any experience in each and every field. Experience first can prove if the knowledge from books is right or wrong. However, people can only understand the justifications and measurements from books.
Furthermore, experimental learning is a very conventional method. However, books have a limitation because there are a lot of new inventions and new products which could not be found in textbooks. The practical skills can be only be learned from experience. As an example, a student will better understand the ideas of mathematics with experimental examples instead of referring to theoretical knowledge. That's why experimental learning is a more productive in an educational era as well as the industrial field.
Overall, no one book can teach us how to deal with situations in our life. Our experiences give the fulfillment of it. And the more effective way of teaching is the personal experience that matters the most as compared to the theories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... of referring to theoretical knowledge. Thats why experimental learning is a more pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, of course, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2125 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05277367051 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1397042835 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217055167699 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795388964029 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1112353122 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154191514034 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126468944946 0.0609392437508 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.