Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
In 21th century, with the various developments of the technology, people can travel everywhere they want. There is an onoing controversy which inevitably leads to a moot question, “How people can learn efficiently?”. In my opinion, the answer should be “by experience”. This essay will discuss controversial aspects of that question.
Nowadays, anywhere can be reachable by the award of technology. People can arrange travel programs by searching new regions and booking tickets on the internet. The next step is to begin observation diligently. Gaining experience needs to be in collaboration with initiative personality. Thus, people earn this ability where they feel communicationally comfortable zone. Learning by experience depends on people’s characteristic features. Extrovert people may be more successful in this way.
However, books are the way cheaper than experiencing everything at once. Experiencing can be restricted because there are numbered bounded topics to explore in the world, for instance, people can experience cooking, history, foreign languages and else, but they cannot practise about complex sciences, impracticable, hard to do in real life topics.
According to the arguments aforementioned, from the above analysis, it is obvious that both sides are controversial but, in my opinion, learning things with experience has better command of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 153, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...ial but, in my opinion, learning things with experience has better command of living...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91176470588 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46097872031 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696078431373 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9518043127 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1428571429 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 20.9669160288 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106406066869 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406593770103 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446348816088 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634166630593 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344629153902 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 53.1260098522 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.