Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that Government should spend less money on promoting art, music, drama and painting. Critics, however, claim that promoting drama and music industry is to provide a plat form to young talent. In my opinion, later argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this statement before deducing final conclusion.
At the out set, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that government support to art and music industry should be limited. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that art, painting, music and drama represent our culture and thus is one of the way to maintain the cultural heritage of the nation. As a prime example, in most of the developed countries, Governments are providing heavy funds to institutes that promotes art, music and drama.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that supporting music, theater and drama is the fundamental stem to encourage youngsters to choose these fields as their careers. Therefore, we clearly see its example in Hollywood, which is the world biggest industry.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that there is a dire need of government’s effort to promote art, music and painting. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this statement before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, so, therefore, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28761061947 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82469018093 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615044247788 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7408963534 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.636363636 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190853289408 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694179108353 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636392473271 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112667940804 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324527110174 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.