Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support it.
The acute importance of hosting events like Olympics, which has always been debatable, upsurge ample spatial arguments resulting in further controversial fervor, and sparked numerous contentions. However, I undisputedly and unambiguously affirm that hosting such events play an important role in our lives. Nevertheless, this essay will colossally elaborate on the disseminating assertions of the benefits of hosting events and provide a well-weighed conclusion derived from the bonafide conformation.
Pragmatically, being imperative in nature, the significance of hosting such events is to eradicate the beleaguered predicaments from society and let it thrive unprecedentedly. The evolution of modern technology has adapted the advanced perceptions and concepts while delivering the economical effects, financial perspectives, and boosting up the trade or tourism industry of the host country. People from around the world visit the country, and thus, the local culture spreads around the globe. It gives job opportunities to local people.
Subsequently, in pledging allegiance to society, the hosting of such events has influenced society enormously in multifarious ways. The benefits of hosting events are preponderantly propagating the initiatives enthusiastically undertaken by the government. This would explore myriads of opportunities, offering negligible impediments, for the youth to follow the sports and such activities. Young people get attracted to this and boost up the industry of sports. Especially, this attracts the women of the state too, as they watch and get influenced. This opens an equal opportunity for all.
So finally, in conclusion, I believe that hosting the Olympics, or the world cup brings a lot of benefits to the host country. Therefore, it influences it economically, socially, and a lot more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 444, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... get attracted to this and boost up the sports industry. Especially, this attracts the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93632958801 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41551267458 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5844090094 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268248997246 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819862803715 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634547111595 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158146526807 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389546559924 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.