How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
The importance of spending time on work, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of spending too much time on work has sparked contention over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. It can be agreed that working for long hours has a negative impact on the personal life and due to this people experience time shortage. This essay will discuss that it’s now a global problem that individuals spend a long time at work which causes various problems.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why there should be a balance between personal and professional life, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that working for long hours leads to depression. As an illustration, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered that investing an exponential amount of time at work hampers the personal life of a person. Hence, a balanced approach to work-life plays a vital role.
Secondly, the key justification for upholding this notion is rooted in the fact that devoting lengthy time in office results in unprecedented problems such as lack of time for personal life and shorter life span. For instance, research conducted by a prestigious university asserts that a huge percentage of people are a victim of diseases caused by the overload of work. Thus, plenty of negative impacts can be observed due to the shortage of personal time.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that around the work people are experiencing a lack of personal time due to spending extra hours in the office. Hence, I believe that personal life should not be hampered because of too much professional work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06360424028 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84334413604 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544169611307 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7329885865 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372988633095 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144749575627 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505168032676 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237327967304 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660746081678 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.