The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Do you Agree or Disagree?
In these days, people often take a variety of viewpoints when it comes to most daily life issue. To give an illustration, while many people believe that the illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but rather those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn, others hold the opinion that this is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the former outlook.
There are numberous reliable grounds to support the belief that rather than not being able to read and write, those who are unable to learn, unlearn and relearn will become the illiterate of the 21st century. First and foremost, people should learn new things because the advancement of technology has revolutionized the way people do things. This is true especially when emails and online social networks have altered the way human communicate. Without being able to relearn the new things, it can be argued that people would be behind the time and become illiterate.
In addtion, ample evidence from a number of studies also suggests that continuous learning is imperative for each individual regardless of age and social status. There is no doubt that technology is changing the way people work. As such, failing to update with the latest knowledge would result in declining productivity and efficiency, leading to loss of jobs. To give an illustration, in the field of computer science, new findings are invented everyday and if the engineers are not catching up with the changes, he would become illiterate in his own field.
In conclusion, from the above analysis, it is obvious that the illiterate of the 21st century will not be those cannot read and write but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...uter science, new findings are invented everyday and if the engineers are not catching u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96551724138 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54613553903 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544827586207 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5099379318 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455870397722 0.242375264174 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153488101727 0.0925447433944 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.238342740947 0.071462118173 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342787681857 0.151781067708 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238117201356 0.0609392437508 391% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.