The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of illiteracy has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “do those who cannot read and write will be illiterate?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the illiterate of 21st century will be about those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, illiteracy is bound up inextricably with broadening horizons, which indicates they lead to both getting rid of bad habits and being a nice person. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and a new lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in fundamental issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of significant impacts is correlated positively with not only forming public attitude but also educational policy reform.
Within the realm of society and culture, without the slightest doubt, tackling negative consequences of being illiterate attribute to thinking out of the box, in that it would come down to creativity, effectiveness, and motivation. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a feasible solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current inefficient system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of surveillance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the illiterate of 21st century will be about those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 311.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54662379421 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18646110799 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659163987138 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4917674035 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.692307692 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360373345308 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100323812441 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173148512453 0.071462118173 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228081814958 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226667514946 0.0609392437508 372% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.