International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem?
Nowadays, the impact of tourism on making people biased has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question " does it make people prejudiced?" Although some people think it is wrong, I tend to believe that it makes humans biased and there are some causes and perfect solutions.
From a religious point of view, western tourists are indeed bound up tightly with cultural changes, which they might lead to both threats to the local culture and religions. For example, a group of profound psychologists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relationship between temples and religious background as well as prayers. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that perfect solutions are correlated positively with not only making them familiar with religions but also tensions.
In social terms, the tourism industry is undoubtedly attributable to social changes, in that it would lead to both social backgrounds and moral reforms. A well-known example of such attributions is narrow-minded persons, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take host countries for granted. Had they provided tourists with constructive suggestions in advance, they might have had the opportunity to improve socio-economic conditions. Thus, prejudiced visitors could play an imperative role in respecting local culture.
To recapitulate, I agree that tourism could make people biased. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rism on making people biased has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58754863813 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08705762059 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657587548638 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7658816097 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109573328868 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411108070539 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533324748545 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679151320477 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478929240722 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.