It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
Having grown up in the country myself, I can say without a doubt that I want my own children to grow up in the city. Life in the city is incomparably better for children than life in the country. The city has better schools, health care, jobs, and more exposure to the outside world.
The two most important things in any child's life are health and education. In the country, if children get sick, there are no good hospitals to take them to. Families are often so poor that they can't afford to send all of their children to school, and the schools are usually of low quality anyway. In the cities, on the other hand, health care facilities and schools are of excellent quality.
Children from cities also have a much higher chance of getting into excellent universities. City universities have large numbers of spaces reserved for local residents while they have relatively fewer spaces for students from the countryside. If I want my child to have a good chance of getting into a good university, I would raise them in a city.
City salaries are significantly higher than salaries in the country. Jobs in the city are also much easier, on average, than jobs in the country. A worker in the country might spend 14 hours a day laboring outdoors in the fields and make much less money per month than the city worker who typically works only eight hours a day. I want my child to grow up and get a good, high-paying job. A better place to find those jobs is in a city.
Finally, I want my children to grow up into a world that is larger than just their immediate surroundings. In a city they will have a chance to meet people from all over the country and all over the world. They will have chances to absorb history and culture from the cities parks, theaters, and museums. Only in the city will they have the chance to be truly global citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o. Families are often so poor that they cant afford to send all of their children to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, finally, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 338.0 242.827586207 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 5.00649968141 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40287144554 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476331360947 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0606247055 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0526315789 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134939585423 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494453367751 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511530794558 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867031419061 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618059181975 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 12.6369458128 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.1260098522 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.5310837438 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.32886699507 84% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 60.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.