Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
The importance of large shopping malls are replacing small shops, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substance influence of large shopping malls are replacing small shops has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that large shopping malls play a vital role in the whole society, although it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how large shopping malls bring a variety of choices and how it causes inconvenient transportations, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons why large shopping malls should replacing small shops, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that large shopping malls bring multiple choices for customers. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that China’s large shopping malls’ products are more than six times than rural areas’ small shops, which not only give a variety of choices to customers but also give them a better shopping experience. Therefore, large shopping malls should replace small shops.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that large shopping malls take some negative impact on the whole society as there are innumerable reasons but the most salient one is that inconvenient transportations. For instance, After small shops are being replaced by large malls, John’s father said he needs to spend over one and half hour to buy some fruits in the nearest large shopping malls. Thus, large shopping malls take some negative impact on people.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that large shopping malls are replacing small shops is prominent, although inconvenient transportation should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4020979021 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86887419405 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517482517483 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6350210831 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.454545455 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346115395456 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176316932881 0.0925447433944 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753450778484 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23196379707 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619595392539 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.