Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals medical technology has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain whether it is a curse or blessing. I will elaborate this notion in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad merits of modern medicines. The first and foremost, medical automation can cure deadly ailments. To cite an example, in ancient times there was no cure of diseases such as malaria and cancer, which ultimately resulted in untimely death of an individual. But, these days, with the advancement of technology there is solution of every ailment.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorn so there are demerits of it. Firstly, it has resulted in dwindling natural death cases. As a result, population is souring day by day. Secondly, medical science has proven to be a bane in the field of job sector. This is because aged masses have experience in their field so due to this young people cannot get the opportunities of job.
To conclude, I firmly believe that medical technology has changed our life. According to my perspective, doctors should cure those patients who are in young age.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94063926941 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74401490784 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.272539812 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.1333333333 104.977214359 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118709734187 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364616690222 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511312176168 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715280076286 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396072847835 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 12.6369458128 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 74.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.